Elevating Educator Practice with Better AI Use
- Michael Langevin, Ph.D.
- Apr 30
- 9 min read

Ever asked AI for help and thought, “Well... that was useless”?
You’re not alone. Plenty of educators have tried ChatGPT or tools like Magic School, typed in a basic request like “create a lesson plan for 4th grade math,” and walked away underwhelmed. The result might have looked polished on the surface, but it lacked the nuance, context, or creativity they needed. They closed the tab, shrugged, and moved on, disappointed but not surprised.
Here’s the thing. The problem isn’t AI. It’s how we’re using it.
Text-generating AI is a brilliant assistant. It follows directions precisely, but it can’t read your mind. Vague or generic prompts lead to surface-level responses. But when your input is clear, detailed, and aligned with a specific goal, that same assistant can deliver something surprisingly useful and fast.
This is where the shotgun versus scalpel idea comes in. Broad, one-size-fits-all prompts produce scattered results with little precision. But when you approach AI with focus and intention, it becomes a scalpel. It helps you do better work, more quickly, with far less cleanup afterward.
In this post, you’ll learn how to move from random to refined by writing stronger prompts. We’ll use a simple three-layer strategy: define the AI’s role, give step-by-step instructions, and include examples. Along the way, you’ll see real before-and-after comparisons, practical classroom applications, and how this shift can dramatically improve your results while giving you back time you didn’t know you were losing.
Let’s sharpen the tools you’re already using and make AI start working for you, instead of the other way around.
Why Generic AI Use Doesn’t Get You Far
Most of the frustration educators feel with AI isn’t about the technology itself. It’s about how we interact with it. When the input is too vague and the context too thin, the results naturally fall flat. That doesn’t mean AI can’t do better. It means it hasn’t been given enough direction to even try.
Take lesson planning, for example. A typical prompt might sound like, “Create a lesson plan for 5th grade math on fractions.” You’ll probably get a warm-up, direct instruction, guided practice, and a formative assessment. But will it include manipulatives for students who need visual support, align with your unit pacing, and account for three IEPs and a new transfer student? Probably not.
Now reframe that same request:“Act as a veteran 5th grade math teacher who supports students struggling with visualizing fractions. Create a small group mini-lesson that uses visual models and hands-on activities. Include a think-aloud strategy and a quick formative check that helps me decide who’s ready to move on.”
The output changes dramatically.
Tools like Magic School and other plug-and-play AI platforms aren’t inherently flawed. They’re built around preloaded prompts, which can be great for sparking ideas, but they often miss the mark when it comes to matching your instructional style, student needs, or pacing. They serve as a good starting point, but they can’t fully adapt unless you give them more precise direction.
The good news is you don’t need to be a tech expert to make that shift. You just need to speak to the AI the same way you’d describe your classroom to a colleague: clearly, specifically, and with purpose. Once you do that, the tool stops feeling generic and starts becoming genuinely helpful.
The Three Layers of a Great Prompt
You already understand how AI works if you’ve ever told students to “add more detail” in their writing. The more precise your instructions, the better the result. Just like students, AI needs context, clarity, and structure to produce something meaningful.
The strongest prompts usually include three distinct layers. Used together, they help the AI understand exactly what you’re asking for, and the improvement in the output is instantly clear.
Layer 1: Define the Role of the AI A prompt like “Act like a teacher” isn’t enough. It’s like giving someone a job without a description. Instead, describe who the AI is, what it knows, and how it should approach the task.
Example: “Act as a veteran instructional coach who has spent the last 15 years mentoring new middle school science teachers in urban schools. Your focus is on hands-on, inquiry-based learning and aligning lessons to state standards while meeting the needs of diverse learners.”
Giving the AI a specific role immediately shapes its tone, depth, and priorities. You’re no longer working with a blank slate. You’re collaborating with a defined perspective.
Layer 2: Give Clear, Step-by-Step Instructions Think of the peanut butter and jelly sandwich activity. Students often write instructions that seem complete until someone follows them literally and ends up with a mess. The same principle applies here.
Strong prompts walk AI through your expectations, one step at a time. Be explicit about:
The type of output you need (lesson plan, rubric, checklist, etc.)
What elements to include (standards, scaffolds, time breakdowns)
The tone or reading level it should match
What to leave out
What to prioritize (like student engagement or real-world relevance)
Prompts don’t need to be short to be effective. Some of the best ones are detailed and deliberate, stretching 15 to 20 lines. AI can handle it, and the clarity pays off in the results.
Layer 3: Provide Examples or Context If you’ve created something similar before, whether a lesson, a rubric, or a feedback comment, you can include it in your prompt. This gives the AI a model to work from.
Example prompt snippet: “Here is a rubric I created last semester that I really liked. I appreciated the way it broke down each level of mastery and used student-friendly language. Please follow a similar structure for this new task.”
With this context, the AI isn’t just producing. It’s mirroring how you want the content to sound and feel.
Put these three layers together, and you turn a simple request into a meaningful collaboration. You’re guiding the tool, not just using it.
Even better, once you build a prompt this way, you don’t have to start from scratch again. You can adapt it, reuse it, and continue getting quality results without reinventing the wheel. We’ll show you how in the next section.
Real Prompt Examples: The Before & After
Basic Prompt:“Create a 5th grade lesson plan on fractions.”
Output:
A standard, surface-level lesson outline
Generic instructional language
No scaffolding or differentiation
Little attention to engagement or assessment
Refined Prompt (with 3 layers):“Act as a veteran 5th grade math teacher in a diverse public school. You have deep experience designing lessons for students who struggle with visualizing fractions. Create a 30-minute small group mini-lesson on using fraction bars to understand equivalent fractions. Include:• A hands-on activity using manipulatives• A short teacher think-aloud to model the concept• A partner discussion prompt• A formative check that helps determine next steps• Student-friendly language throughout• Format your response as a lesson plan with time stamps and bullet points.”
Output:
Instructional flow is clear and responsive to student needs
Tools and engagement strategies are included
Assessment is aligned and useful for grouping
Language is age-appropriate and ready to use
Little to no revision required
Example 2: Student Feedback Generator
Basic Prompt:“Write feedback for a student’s argumentative essay.”
Output:
Feedback is vague: “Good job! Try to improve your evidence.”
No reference to specific parts of the writing
Lacks an encouraging or constructive tone
Refined Prompt: “Act as a middle school ELA teacher giving formative feedback on an argumentative essay. The student’s writing includes a strong thesis but struggles with organizing evidence in a logical order. Provide two specific pieces of feedback: one positive and one actionable. Use warm, supportive language appropriate for a 7th grader. Limit your response to 3–4 sentences.”
Output: “You did a great job stating your opinion clearly. It’s easy to see what you believe. To make your argument even stronger, try organizing your evidence in a way that builds up to your most convincing point. This will help your reader follow your thinking more easily. Keep going; you’re close!”
This feedback works because it’s focused and specific, offering students clear guidance they can act on right away. While the tone encourages continued effort, it also reinforces what the student has done well, supporting a growth mindset in the process. By connecting directly to writing standards, it makes alignment with instructional goals seamless. And because the structure is so adaptable, it can be reused for multiple student samples without needing to start from scratch.
Why This Matters
These aren’t just cleaner responses. They’re better starting points. A well-built prompt leads to output that’s already 80 percent complete, so your time goes into refining instead of starting from scratch.
And there’s a compounding effect. Once you create a strong prompt, whether it’s for lesson planning, rubric design, or student feedback, you can revisit it, change a few words, and repurpose it again and again. That initial investment continues to save you time every time you return to it.
You’re not logging in to AI and hoping something useful appears. You’re arriving with a blueprint. You’re in control of the process, shaping the outcome with clarity and intent.
The Impact in the Classroom
When teachers move from one-line prompts to structured, intentional ones, the difference is immediate. And it’s not just in the AI’s output. The shift impacts planning time, instructional quality, and even professional confidence.
Let’s begin with time. Teachers who write strong prompts often discover they’re not spending more time with AI but less. Their prompts generate results that require minimal revision, which means lesson plans come out clearer, rubrics align more closely to standards, and student feedback takes minutes rather than hours. It’s not about having AI do everything; it’s about allowing it to handle the heavy lift up front so teachers can focus on refining and delivering instruction.
The real advantage appears in the long-term payoff. A well-crafted prompt doesn’t just work once. It can be used again and again. For example, if you’ve written a strong prompt to design inquiry-based science lessons for 8th graders, you don’t need to start over for each unit. You can simply swap the topic by changing cells to weather systems or chemical reactions, and the structure still holds. What once took thirty minutes now takes five.
Over time, this turns into more than just a smart tactic. It becomes a personal toolkit. Teachers start to build a library of high-quality prompts they can reuse for lesson plans, assessments, family emails, enrichment tasks, and even sub plans. Each time they adapt a prompt, they become quicker, more efficient, and more in tune with their own instructional voice.
Just as important, they begin to feel a stronger sense of control. In the early stages, using AI can feel like guesswork. You type something in and hope for something helpful. But that uncertainty fades as educators learn to write with precision. They realize they aren’t reacting to what the tool gives them. They’re shaping the experience from the start.
When you become the architect of your prompts, you become the architect of your AI experience. That’s when transformation in the classroom really begins.
Prompt Writing as a Teach-It-Forward Skill
One of the most overlooked benefits of learning how to prompt well is that it’s not just a teacher skill. It’s also a thinking skill. Once you’ve developed it, you’re in a strong position to help your students do the same.
At its core, prompt writing is structured communication. It teaches clarity, sequencing, tone, and purpose. When students learn to craft effective prompts for AI, they’re also learning to think more intentionally about their goals. What do I need? What am I trying to create? What information does this tool require to help me get there?
Now imagine the possibilities.
A student uses AI to summarize a research article, but before doing so, they’ve been taught to prompt it like this:“Summarize this article as if you’re explaining it to a classmate who was absent. Use bullet points, avoid technical jargon, and highlight any controversial or debatable claims.”
A student writing a short story might say:“Give me five creative endings for a short story that starts with a kid finding a mysterious key in a forest. Keep the tone suspenseful and write at a middle school reading level.”
Teaching students how to write prompts turns AI from a shortcut into something far more powerful: a thinking partner. They’re not just asking for answers. They’re learning how to guide a process, evaluate the responses they get, and revise based on what they receive. That’s digital responsibility and critical thinking built into a single skill.
Reflection deepens the learning.
Ask students:
Did the AI give you what you expected? What could you have asked differently? How does this compare to what you would have written on your own?
As students grow more fluent in the process, their relationship with AI begins to shift. They stop seeing it as a substitute for thinking and start using it as a tool to enhance it. Just like with teachers, their prompts become more precise, their outcomes more meaningful, and their confidence more grounded.
Ultimately, when you teach students how to prompt well, you’re not just giving them access to AI. You’re giving them access to better questions, clearer thinking, and deeper learning.
Conclusion
The real power of AI doesn’t come from how often you use it. It comes from how intentionally you use it.
When you learn to craft layered, thoughtful prompts, you stop treating AI like a gimmick and begin using it as a tool. You move from frustration into flow, from randomness to refinement, and from generic outputs to genuinely useful support.
You don’t need to write the perfect prompt on your first try. What matters is that you begin shaping it. Define the AI’s role, walk it through step-by-step instructions, and include a clear example of what you want. Then try it out. See what comes back. Adjust, refine, and keep what works.
Once you’ve developed a few reliable prompts, the benefits start to build. You’ll save time. You’ll see stronger results with less effort. And over time, you’ll create a workflow where AI truly feels like a partner, responsive to your voice, your standards, and your needs.
Your Turn: Try It This Week Choose a prompt you’ve already used, whether for a lesson, a student task, or a piece of feedback, and rebuild it using the three-layer approach. Pay close attention to how the output changes, then ask yourself:
How much revision did I need to do?
What would happen if I reused this structure next week?
This is how the shift begins: one refined prompt at a time.
Comments